.
Hi Everyone,
.
I’m sending this message to inform all of the social, legal, cultural and historical importance of Bill 33, Toby’s Act: Right to be Free from Discrimination and Harassment Because of Gender Identity or Gender Expression, 2012.  On Monday, June 11, 2012 Queer Ontario deputed before the Ontario Legislative Standing Committee on Social Policy with regard to this Bill urging them to pass it.  See the Queer Ontario deputation at: http://queerontario.org/2012/06/11/bill33-deputation/
.
This is somewhat lengthy, but I ask that you bear with me as their is some important information here I wanted to share.
.
Significance to Trans Communities:  It goes without saying that this Bill is long overdue to ensure the social recognition and legal protections needed for the trans communities.  Trans people have been calling for this for a very long time, the Bill is currently in its fourth (4th) attempt at being passed and the Ontario Human Rights Commission has been calling for the inclusion of ‘gender identity’ in the Ontario Human Rights Code since 1999.  Queer Ontario, with a mandate that addresses the needs of gender and sexual diverse people inclusive of trans and genderqueer communities strongly supports the passage of Bill 33.  For our comprehensive position on this Bill, see our deputation at http://queerontario.org/2012/06/11/bill33-deputation/
.
Significance to Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals:  Following Queer Ontario’s deputation, the Ontario Human Rights Commission as represented by Barbara Hall, Chief Human Rights Commissioner, deputed.  Clearly in support of Bill 33 to ensure social and legal recognition and protections, she outlined a series of amendments to the Bill.  One of the amendments involves enumerating ‘sexual orientation’ under sections 2(2) and 5(2) dealing with harassment.  This is a long-standing recommendation by both the Ontario Human Rights Commission and the LGB communities.  25 years ago when our predecessor, the Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Ontario (CLGRO) succeeded in getting ‘sexual orientation’ added to the Ontario Human Rights Code following an 11-year campaign, the primary activists involved recognized it wasn’t a complete victory, as harassment was not covered.  The NDP’s Cheri DiNovo, who is shepherding Toby’s Act through Parliament indicated that the NDP would be using the OHRC amendments for the Bill.  There is now an opportunity to redress this gap within Bill 33.
.
Historical Significance:  The anticipated passage of Bill 33 holds great historical significance at this particular time in queer history:
.
– Passage would take place just over 25 years after ‘sexual orientation’ was added to the OHRC

– Inclusion of ‘gender identity’ and ‘gender expression’ in the OHRC could come into place during the same week the Ontario Human Rights Commission has its 50th anniversary

– The vote for Bill 33 is to take place on Wednesday, June 13, 2012 exactly 13 years to the day (June 13, 1999) police raided the Bijou, a gay/bisexual sex bar/theatre (since closed) in downtown Toronto.
.
We have come a long way as a queer community.  This is one of those rare times, close on the heels of the recently successful passage of Bill 13 Accepting Schools Act addressing bullying and GSAs we are on the verge of another successful bill passage.  To witness a highly anticipated historic moment attend the third (3rd) reading and vote on Bill 33 at Queen’s Park on Wednesday morning, June 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM.
.
All the best,
.
Nick Mulé
Chairperson,
Queer Ontario
.
.

A presentation given by Nick Mulé, Chairperson of Queer Ontario, at the We Demand: Sex / Activism / History in Canada Conference that took place in Vancouver, BC from August 25 to August 28, 2011.

Summary:
.
A mere three years and four months following the 1971 “We Demand” demonstration in Ottawa, the Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Ontario (CLGRO) was founded. Very much based upon the principles of the “We Demand” document, over the next 34 plus years CLGRO was at the forefront of the lesbian and gay movement in Ontario. This paper examines how CLGRO was influenced by the “We Demand” action and how it in turn became an influential forerunner within the LGBT movement not only provincially, but nationally and internationally. Underscoring the work of CLGRO and its successor Queer Ontario is the politic of queer liberationism. As such, a queer liberationist perspective has and continues to distinguish the work of CLGRO and Queer Ontario. In a climate in which a neo-liberal, mainstreaming, assimilationist approach dominates both from within and without the LGBT movement, the work of queer liberationists is compounded and multi-layered requiring a critical discourse that questions and challenges on all fronts including within the movement itself. With the number of political LGBT groups decreasing across the country, and fewer and fewer of those remaining undertaking a liberationist agenda, the movement is at risk of sliding into a heteronormative and cisgendered worldview. Queer liberationists, as exemplified by CLGRO and Queer Ontario, through principled work based on the integrity of the original “We Demand” calls for change provide a progressive, alternative voice to the status quo, towards ensuring diversity both within LGBT communities and in broader Canadian society.
.
The PowerPoint Presentation:

Toronto: Queer Ontario feels the Elementary Health and Physical Education Curriculum proposed by the McGuinty government back in January of 2010 was a step in the right direction that would have provided Ontario children and youth with up-to-date scientific information on human development, physical health, sex, sexuality, sexual behaviour, and gender identity. So it came as a tremendous disappointment to hear that McGuinty succumbed to the pressures that were created by sex-negative religious fundamentalists, moral conservatives, and misinformed parents, ultimately rescinding the curriculum just 54 hours after he had come out in strong support of it.

Given that the first round of consultations had already taken into consideration the concerns of parent groups and religious organizations like the Institute for Catholic Education – alongside public health organizations, sex educators, school boards, academics, and LGBTQ groups including Queer Ontario’s predecessor, the Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in Ontario (CLGRO), – the new curriculum was in no way under consulted and actually served to bring Ontario’s Health and Physical Education Curriculum in line with those of other, more progressive provinces like British Columbia. The new proposed curriculum is long overdue, especially in its recognition of ‘invisible differences’ like sexual orientation, gender identity, and cultural values and beliefs: a much-needed concept that would begin to acknowledge the full diversity of Ontario’s population within Ontario’s elementary school systems.
Read more…